Artificial intelligence (AI), machine deep learning, data mining, and another modern computer technologies concepts. Brain representing artificial intelligence and businessman holding futuristic tablet.
I love the ATS market. I always have and I always will. I have talked about it so much over the past 20 years that even my kids can define an ATS.
More than a decade ago, we published our first ATS Index report. I wrote that “this is not your grandma’s ATS.” At the time, it was a reaction to systems that were rigid, compliance-heavy, and built more for process than for people.
We are able to publish our latest ATS Index and that statement still holds. But for a very different reason. The ATS has changed more in the past three years than it did in the decade before it. And yet, many of the expectations around it have not caught up.
As we prepare to publish this year’s ATS Index, one thing is clear… the conversation about the ATS needs to shift. Not just in how we evaluate it, but in what we expect it to deliver.
From System of Record to System of Execution to System of Experience
The ATS was never meant to just store data. But for years, that’s how it was used.
Today, that model is breaking. The ATS is becoming a system of execution. It is where decisions are made, where workflows happen, and increasingly, where AI operates. This shift is especially evident with the rise of agentic capabilities.
Agentic ATS is not about adding another feature or chatbot. It is about systems that can take action. Screening candidates. Scheduling interviews. Driving follow-up. Supporting hiring managers directly. But most organizations are not ready for this shift. Not because the technology is not there, but because the workflows are not defined, the data is not connected, and the expectations are unclear. The work needs to clearly be defined first. I can’t stress this enough. The real question is not whether your ATS has AI. It is whether it can actually execute work on your behalf.
If It Doesn’t Fit the Recruiter Workflow, It Doesn’t Work
For all the innovation happening in this space, one issue remains unchanged: the disconnect between systems and how recruiters actually work. Recruiters are still navigating too many systems. Too many clicks. Too many manual steps.
And in frontline and high-volume environments, the challenge is even greater. In many cases, there are no recruiters. Hiring is owned by managers who have limited time and little training on hiring technology. Yet most ATS platforms are still designed with a traditional recruiter in mind. This is where the gap is most visible.
An effective ATS must fit into the workflow. Not the other way around. That means:
Embedded experiences, not separate systems
Mobile-first design for frontline hiring
Simplicity for hiring managers
Automation that reduces steps, not adds to them
This is not about usability. It is about adoption. And ultimately, outcomes.
The ATS Is Expanding. But Not Always Intentionally
Another shift we see in this year’s Index is the expanding scope of the ATS. What used to be a defined category is now blurred.
Today’s ATS may include:
CRM capabilities
Interview scheduling and intelligence
AI Interviews
AI-driven screening and matching
Candidate communications
Analytics and reporting
Internal mobility and talent marketplace features
Sourcing
The list goes on and the ATS is no longer just about hiring. It is increasingly connected to broader talent strategies. But this expansion is not always strategic. Vendors are building more. Buyers are expecting more. But few organizations have clarity on what should live inside the ATS versus what should be integrated around it.
This is where the platform conversation becomes real. Not best of breed versus suite. But platform versus platform. And the ATS sits at the center of it.
We Need to Rethink How We Measure ROI
One of the biggest challenges in the ATS market today is how success is defined. For years, ROI was measured in efficiency:
Time to fill
Cost per hire
Recruiter productivity
Those metrics still matter. But they are no longer enough. The value of the ATS today is tied to outcomes:
Quality of hire
Candidate experience
Hiring manager effectiveness
Ability to hire at scale
Risk mitigation and compliance
And increasingly, the impact of AI.
If your ATS is making decisions or taking action, then ROI must also account for:
Accuracy of those decisions
Fairness and bias mitigation
Transparency and trust
This requires a different level of accountability and measurement.
Frontline Hiring Is Forcing the Market to Change
If there is one area pushing ATS innovation forward, it is frontline hiring. High-volume environments have fundamentally different needs:
Speed over process
Managers over recruiters
Mobile over desktop
Simplicity over configurability
And yet, for years, these needs were underserved. That is changing. We are seeing more ATS solutions designed specifically for frontline environments. More automation. More conversational interfaces. More SMS capabilities. More focus on reducing friction in the apply and hiring process. Frontline hiring is not a niche. It is forcing a redesign of how hiring technology works. And the lessons from this segment will shape the broader market.
The ATS is no longer a static system. It is an evolving platform that sits at the center of talent acquisition and increasingly, talent management. But with that evolution comes complexity. More capability does not automatically mean more value.
The organizations that will get the most from their ATS are not the ones with the most features. They are the ones that:
There was no shortage of energy around AI. Every conversation, every booth, every session seemed to focus on AI and the future of AI. But beneath that excitement, a few themes stood out to me that feel more important than just the headlines.
1. AI Must Move Beyond Efficiency to Outcomes
We’ve spent the last few years focused on how AI can make things faster. Automate scheduling. Improve matching. Reduce manual work. That’s table stakes now.
In my conversation with Tyler Weeks, SVP of People Technology at Marriot, one point really stuck: AI needs to move beyond individual productivity and into enterprise impact. This isn’t about helping a recruiter move faster. It’s about whether organizations are making better hiring decisions, improving quality, and driving measurable outcomes.
Efficiency is easy to sell but outcomes are harder to prove. And, that’s where this needs to go.
2. The End of the Point Solution Era
It’s getting harder to find a true point solution. And the question of suite or best of breed is dated.
Every vendor is expanding. Every platform is becoming broader. What used to be sourcing, CRM, or assessment tools are now positioning themselves as end to end platforms. On one hand, this makes sense. Talent acquisition has been too fragmented for too long. But on the other hand, it raises a real question: If everyone is a platform, how do buyers evaluate where real depth and value exist?
We are moving from a best of breed conversation to a platform consolidation reality. But clarity has not caught up.
3. Agentic AI Is Everywhere but Still Undefined
You could not walk the expo floor without seeing the word “agentic.” It’s on every booth. In every demo. Across every category. But the definition is inconsistent. Some vendors are talking about true orchestration of tasks across systems. Others are rebranding automation or copilots. And very few are showing what this actually looks like in a live, end to end workflow.
4. Trust Is the Foundation of Transformation
In my workshop on TA transformation, one topic kept coming up over and over again: trust.
Trust with candidates. Trust internally across teams. Trust in how AI is being used. And trust in vendors. Candidates expect transparency and communication. Internally, teams are being asked to adopt technologies they don’t fully understand. And buyers are being asked to invest in solutions that often sound identical. Without trust, none of this scales. And right now, trust is fragile.
5. Differentiation Is Getting Harder
Everyone sounds the same. Every vendor is talking about AI. About skills. About platforms. About improving experience. About outcomes. But when messaging converges, differentiation disappears.This puts more pressure on buyers to go deeper. Not just what a vendor says, but what they can prove. What outcomes they can show. What problems they actually solve in production environments. The market is getting louder, but not necessarily clearer.
6. Transformation Requires Stages, Not Just Incremental Change
We talk a lot about transformation. But most organizations are still operating in incremental improvement mode.Adding AI to existing workflows. Layering on new tools. Optimizing pieces of the process. That’s not transformation.
Real transformation requires stages. Moving from automation to AI to more intelligent, orchestrated systems. It requires rethinking how work gets done, not just improving how it gets done today. And most organizations are still early in that journey.
The next phase of this market will not be defined by who has AI. It will be defined by who can prove it works.
Cutting-edge tech (AI, data access, 5G) drives business success, growth, and innovation, attracting diverse markets and enhancing services for added value and customer satisfaction.
The talent acquisition environment is undergoing significant change as organizations try to balance rising expectations with reduced resources. Recruiters are facing growing administrative workloads, fluctuating hiring needs, and candidates who expect clarity and responsiveness throughout the process. At the same time, many talent acquisition leaders are reexamining the effectiveness of existing systems and questioning whether current tools truly support better decision making.
Our recent research explored these pressures in depth. It examined the most urgent challenges facing talent teams today and the areas where organizations expect the next wave of innovation to occur. Vonq’s newly announced agentic talent acquisition solution aligns closely with what leaders told us they need, and it reflects several of the highest demand areas identified in the research.
What the Research Revealed About Today’s TA Challenges
Across industries and company sizes, talent acquisition leaders consistently highlighted three concerns.
Growing workload with reduced capacity
More than seventy percent of recruiters reported that their work has become more challenging since before the pandemic. Many teams now operate with fewer recruiters than they had in previous years. Administrative tasks, manual communication, and disconnected workflows continue to consume time that could be spent evaluating talent or partnering with hiring managers.
Difficulty evaluating quality
Quality of hire has become a central priority for executives, yet many organizations still lack the structure and data needed to evaluate talent consistently. Traditional processes often do not reveal whether a candidate can actually perform the work or grow into a role. Leaders expressed a clear need for better interview consistency, more transparent decision support, and stronger alignment between recruiters and hiring managers.
Candidate expectations that outpace current systems
Candidates expect timely updates, clarity on next steps, and communication that feels relevant to them. However, many organizations continue to rely on outdated or fragmented processes that make it difficult to deliver an experience that matches what applicants expect.
These challenges are not isolated. They point to a broader need for systems that can coordinate information, reduce manual work, and provide more structure across the entire hiring process.
Why Agentic Intelligence Is Becoming a Priority
While automation has been part of talent acquisition for many years, organizations told us they are now looking for something more advanced. Interest in agentic systems is increasing as leaders search for ways to introduce adaptive intelligence into hiring.
In our study, a significant portion of organizations reported using or planning to use agents or copilots in the near future. Leaders see potential in systems that can take context into account, support reasoning, and help improve decision quality rather than simply speeding up existing tasks.
The concepts that generated the strongest interest included consistent communication with candidates, structured interviewing support, and more transparent evaluation methods. These use cases reflect the areas where teams feel the most pressure, and where intelligent assistance could provide the most value.
How Vonq’s Announcement Aligns With Market Demand
Vonq’s agentic model addresses the specific areas that leaders highlighted as priorities.
Candidate Engagement
The Candidate Journey Agent focuses on communication and clarity, two areas where candidates frequently express dissatisfaction. It reflects a growing need to guide candidates through the process in a consistent and structured way.
Interview Support
The Interview Agent addresses one of the key gaps identified in the research. Many organizations lack tools that provide structure, reduce variability, and bring more fairness and predictability to interviews.
Talent Evaluation
The Assessment Agent provides a more transparent and competency based view of talent. This aligns with the increased focus on quality of hire and with leaders’ desire for clearer, more defensible evaluation methods.
Across these use cases, the model reflects a broader shift toward intelligence that helps recruiters make better decisions, improves alignment with hiring managers, and strengthens the overall consistency of the process.
A Meaningful Step Toward the Future of Talent Acquisition
The findings from our research and Vonq’s announcement both point toward the same conclusion. Talent teams are looking for solutions that help them operate with more structure, more clarity, and more support at every stage of hiring. They want tools that reduce the burden of administrative work, improve the quality of decisions, and create a more reliable experience for candidates and hiring managers.
Yello and WayUp Merger: A New Look at Early Talent
For nearly two decades, I’ve watched talent acquisition technology try to evolve from a series of disconnected systems into a more sophisticated ecosystem built on data, intelligence, and automation. But, with all the innovation, one challenge remains…scheduling.
In our latest Aptitude Research 2025 CRM Index Report, we found that while AI, personalization, and automation are priorities, recruiters still lose hours every week just trying to coordinate calendars. Scheduling, once viewed as an operational afterthought, has become the biggest source of frustration and inefficiency in talent acquisition.
Why Scheduling Is a Breaking Point
Scheduling touches every part of the candidate journey. From campus events to final interviews, it’s the connective tissue between interest and action. Yet most CRMs still treat it as a plug-in, not a core capability.
According to our research, organizations expect their CRM to:
Integrate directly with hiring manager calendars (Outlook, Google)
Offer self-service scheduling for interviews and events
Provide real-time availability detection and automated follow-ups
Sync with ATS workflows for a seamless candidate experience
But few platforms deliver this natively. The result is endless email threads, missed connections, and lost candidates. In high-volume or event-based recruiting, these gaps can turn enthusiasm into attrition overnight.
Scheduling as a Conversion Driver — Not an Admin Task
In today’s CRM-driven world, scheduling isn’t just logistics — it’s conversion. Whether it’s embedding booking links in nurture campaigns or integrating interview availability into event registration, scheduling determines velocity.
When scheduling breaks down, so does candidate momentum. Every delay adds friction. Every missed sync between the CRM and ATS creates confusion. And in an era where 70% of candidates expect a same-day response, lag time equals lost talent.
In our study, recruiters consistently described scheduling as the “bottleneck no one owns.” It sits between systems, between teams, and between strategy and execution — and it’s costing organizations real results.
The Ecosystem Is Expanding, But the Experience Is Fragmented
Some CRMs build native tools; others rely on third-party integrations like GoodTime, Prelude, or Calendly to fill the gap. It’s not uncommon for recruiters to juggle three or more scheduling tools, each slightly misaligned with the CRM or ATS.
What Recruiters Need Now
Recruiters don’t need another AI writing assistant or dashboard. They need systems that make scheduling invisible — embedded, intelligent, and integrated into the workflows they already use. The future of CRM lies in orchestration, not addition.
The best-performing organizations in our research are already shifting toward:
Unified scheduling orchestration across CRM and ATS
Real-time coordination with hiring managers’ calendars
AI-powered slot recommendations that reduce back-and-forth
Automated follow-ups that protect candidate experience and recruiter bandwidth
When scheduling works, it becomes the quiet engine of recruiting velocity. When it doesn’t, it becomes the biggest source of friction and fatigue.
CRM is no longer a static database; it’s an operating model that should orchestrate every stage of engagement — from first click to final offer. If scheduling isn’t built into that orchestration, recruiters will keep struggling, and CRMs will keep collecting dust. The next generation of CRM leaders won’t just build scheduling tools — they’ll design scheduling experiences that finally close the loop between connection and conversion.
In two weeks at UNLEASH World in Paris, I’m excited to join Wilfrid Bas, Directeur Talent Management at Coca-Cola Europacific Partners (CCEP), on stage to share one of the most inspiring workforce transformation stories I’ve seen this year.
As one of the world’s largest Coca-Cola bottlers, CCEP employs over 41,000 people across 31 countries. Their challenge was both simple and complex: how do you ensure every employee, no matter where they sit, has visibility into their skills, career paths, and opportunities to grow?
Rather than just focusing on new roles or career events, CCEP looked deeper. Through engagement surveys and exit interviews, they realized the real challenge wasn’t a lack of opportunity—it was a lack of visibility. Employees couldn’t see the paths in front of them, and that lack of clarity impacted retention and mobility.
A Strategic and Human-Centered Approach
CCEP addressed this head-on by building a skills-based talent strategy that blends AI, workforce planning, and culture. Using Eightfold’s Career Hub, they created what employees now call their “Internal LinkedIn”—a platform that personalizes career paths, surfaces roles and mentoring opportunities, and democratizes access to growth for everyone.
They narrowed their skills framework to focus on the 100 most critical skills to the business, mapped every role to 3–5 key skills, and launched capability academies to build future-ready talent. This wasn’t just a tech implementation—it was a change journey supported by storytelling, local champions, and leadership sponsorship across markets.
Real Impact, at Scale
The results speak for themselves:
78% adoption across 42,000 employees
53% of permanent roles filled through internal mobility, far above industry averages
Employees with complete profiles are 3x more likely to move internally
Retention among top performers has dropped to 2.5%
This session will explore how Coca-Cola Europacific Partners brought these initiatives to life, the lessons learned along the way, and what’s next as they integrate skills visibility into workforce planning and AI-powered development.
Session: How CCEP is Using AI to Build Skills, Careers, and Culture for a Distributed Workforce Tuesday, October 21 | 3:30–3:55pm | Stage 5 | Paris Convention Centre
Radancy’s recent acquisition of myInterview reflects a bigger story about where talent acquisition is headed—and how technology providers are evolving to meet recruiter, hiring manager, and candidate expectations.
At Aptitude Research, we believe that CRM, scheduling, and interview technologies are no longer standalone categories. They are foundational to how recruiters and hiring managers work together and how organizations deliver an integrated candidate experience. Radancy’s move into asynchronous video interviewing makes complete sense when viewed through this lens.
Elevating Recruiter and Hiring Manager Experience
Recruiters today are being asked to do more with less. They balance relationship-building, marketing, data analysis, and technology orchestration in ways that would have been unimaginable a decade ago. Hiring managers, in turn, want a process that is fast, intuitive, and collaborative.
This acquisition puts Radancy in a strong position to improve both experiences:
For recruiters: Seamless scheduling, integrated CRM workflows, and AI-driven insights reduce administrative burdens and free them to focus on relationship-building. Scheduling has become a “make-or-break capability” within CRM platforms, and embedding it into campaign design and lead conversion workflows directly impacts recruiter productivity.
For hiring managers: Access to structured, on-demand candidate insights means faster decision-making and less time spent coordinating calendars. Integrating myInterview’s video capabilities with Radancy’s career sites and CRM infrastructure will help managers engage earlier and more meaningfully with candidates.
Radancy’s Expanding AI Vision
Radancy has positioned itself as an AI-first provider, focusing on scalability and orchestration through a single platform rather than siloed features. This acquisition deepens that strategy in three ways:
Agentic AI + Interviewing: CRM is no longer just about emails and pipelines—it’s about intelligent systems that act on behalf of recruiters. By combining Agentic AI workflows with candidate video data, Radancy can deliver richer insights while maintaining transparency and explainability.
Personalization at Scale: Hyper-personalization is no longer a differentiator, it’s a requirement. Adding video allows Radancy to bring more authenticity and context into personalized candidate journeys, from career sites to recruiter outreach.
Responsible AI: Transparency matters. Half of companies say they won’t adopt AI if they can’t explain its recommendations. Integrating video with auditable, explainable AI models is a natural evolution for Radancy’s platform.
Why This Move Makes Complete Sense
The 2025 Aptitude Research CRM Index found that:
CRM cannot be viewed in isolation. It’s now the orchestration layer for ATS, sourcing, scheduling, and interviewing.
Scheduling and interview integration drive real ROI by collapsing time-to-interview, improving candidate conversion, and enabling hiring managers to engage sooner.
Adoption defines success. Only 14% of companies use more than half their CRM’s functionality. Tools like video interviewing, embedded within existing recruiter workflows, are far more likely to drive adoption than bolt-on solutions.
Radancy has long been recognized as a leader in recruitment technology and TA innovation—transforming the “front door” of the candidate journey into a dynamic, personalized experience. With myInterview, they extend that same vision deeper into the hiring funnel.
Looking Ahead
This acquisition signals where the market is headed: toward intelligent, integrated ecosystems where recruiters and hiring managers no longer juggle disjointed tools, but operate in a single flow of data, decisions, and experiences.
For Radancy, it’s not a pivot—it’s a continuation of their vision. For recruiters and hiring managers, it promises less friction and more impact. And for the broader market, it underscores a truth Aptitude Research has been highlighting: CRM, scheduling, and interview technology are not isolated investments—they are the connective tissue of modern talent acquisition.
For more information on Radancy and their acquisition of myInterview, you can visit the Radancy website here.
The energy at this year’s HR Technology Conference was incredible. More than anything else, the event reminded me that this industry is about people and relationships. Technology may be the headline, but the real story is the connections we make with colleagues, providers, and partners all working toward the same goal. It’s an amazing industry, and I am so happy to be part of it.
This year’s conversations and announcements reinforced that theme. From agentic AI to payroll and compliance, every innovation we saw ultimately comes back to building stronger, more human connections. Here are the highlights across the key themes that stood out to me:
1. Agentic AI
Agentic AI took center stage this year, with vendors moving beyond hype to real, usable agents that act on behalf of recruiters, managers, and employees.
Eightfold announced expanded agent capabilities including its AI Interviewer and Digital Twin, strengthening its talent intelligence platform.
Phenom went live with four distinct agents previewed earlier this year—supporting candidates, employees, recruiters, and managers.
hireEZ unveiled EZ Agent, embedding conversational intelligence directly into sourcing.
Oleeo is applying AI to automate recruiting workflows, from intelligent candidate scoring to diversity-focused hiring.
Visier launched its Visier Manager Agent, delivering workforce insights in real time.
Pitchfest Winner: SonicJobs wowed the crowd with its agent-first approach to high-volume hiring.
2. Empowering People Managers
At the end of the day, managers are the key to a positive employee experience. It was encouraging to see providers focus on supporting this critical group.
HiBob rolled out new manager enablement features to simplify performance and feedback.
Visier is equipping managers with analytics they can actually act on.
Enboarder continues to shine with nudges that strengthen manager-new hire and employee connections.
3. Payroll
Payroll has been hot this year. Vendors are expanding scope and reach to make this process seamless.
HiBob introduced U.S. payroll, extending its global footprint.
isolveddelivered enhancements for SMB payroll and compliance broadly and by vertical.
UKG focused on multi-country payroll efficiency and innovation through AI capabilities.
4. People Analytics & Labor Market Insights
Analytics and labor insights are giving HR teams a clearer picture of people and skills—critical for planning and growth.
Lightcastcontinues to push boundaries with expanded partnerships, delivering unmatched labor market intelligence. This is the provider to watch.
5. Acquisitions
Consolidation is changing the HR Tech landscape, but what stands out is how teams are navigating these transitions while keeping relationships intact.
iCIMS acquired Albi, adding to its conversational AI arsenal.
SmartRecruiters officially closed its acquisition by SAP—and notably, the full team is staying on.
Paradox continues to grow while deepening customer relationships.
Workdayexpanded its portfolio with Sana, boosting employee experience.
Radancy acquired MyInterview, further strengthening its talent marketing solutions.
6. Compliance
With more than 150 new regulations this year, compliance is about trust—ensuring that organizations and employees alike feel confident.
Experian Employer Services is leading the way with new verification and compliance tools that make a complex area more transparent.
7. Innovations Addressing Fundamental Gaps
Some of the most exciting conversations were about solving gaps that directly impact relationships between employers and employees.
Quality of Hire: CrossChq announced its Quality of Hire winners- giving us a standard we have needed in this industry around the most important metrics.
Communication: Too many systems still lack SMS. Emissary is tackling this with text-based communication for every stage of hiring and employee experience. We have two new reports focused on healthcare and high-volume.
Candidate Fraud: Greenhouse launched Real Talent, a new AI-driven solution with spam, fraud & cheating detection plus identity verification (via CLEAR1), helping recruiters filter out fake, bot-driven, or deceptive applications and surface real human candidates faster.
High-Volume Recruiting: Our research highlights the role of mobile-first communication in healthcare and hourly hiring—where relationships are often built in seconds.
Compensation & Skills:Salary.com is linking pay data and skills taxonomies earlier in recruiting, bringing transparency to candidate conversations.
Talent Platforms: ClearCompanycontinues to build and innovate toward a unified platform supporting the full employee journey.
Final Takeaway
This year’s HR Tech Conference wasn’t just about technology—it was about people. Every innovation I saw, from AI to analytics, is designed to strengthen relationships: between candidates and recruiters, managers and employees, companies and their people.
It’s an amazing industry that continues to inspire me, and I’m so grateful to be part of it.
As the CRM market matures, pricing is becoming a strategic differentiator. Moving beyond simple, subscription models or size-based tiers, vendors are embracing flexible, customer-centric approaches tailored to actual usage. This shift reflects a broader trend: buyers want alignment with outcomes, not arbitrary numbers.
AI Integration: A Pricing Challenge With AI capabilities now embedded deeply in CRM platforms, pricing models are at an inflection point. Many providers are cautiously observing how usage grows before adjusting their pricing, while savvy vendors are already experimenting with innovative structures to stay ahead.
Emerging Pricing Frameworks Here are a few of the new pricing models being discussed:
Integration‑scope pricing: Fees based on how many systems a CRM connects with and to what depth.
Volume-based pricing: Costs tied to data processed, such as record count or API calls.
Outcome-based pricing: Charges tied to measurable business results (e.g., leads generated, pipeline influenced).
These flexible models directly address buyer frustration with “pay for what you don’t use.” Subscription plans are also becoming more agile, replacing rigid, long-term contracts.
AI Consumption Pricing The proliferation of AI usage, think automated tasks, predictive recommendations, and generative content, demands pricing that scales with activity. Flat-fee structures won’t cut it. Leading vendors are introducing consumption-based pricing, aligning fees with actual AI usage in real time. This mirrors mature SaaS and cloud strategies.
Why This Matters Now
Cost transparency: Buyers gain clarity on where they’re spending and why.
Scalable value: Vendors can tie revenue to growth, and don’t penalize light users or punish heavy adopters with flat rates.
Strategic differentiation: Innovative pricing becomes a go-to-market lever in a crowded space.
Key Takeaways for CRM Leaders
Assess your pricing maturity: Are you still locked into traditional pricing? Think beyond software into services, data, integrations, and AI usage.
Experiment incrementally: Pilot usage-based tiers or data‑volume models with select customer cohorts.
Learn from peers: Monitor how fast adopters are pricing AI consumption. Don’t just wait, innovate.
Educate customers on impact: Shift focus from “What does it cost?” to “What does it enable?”
As CRM shifts from tool to strategic platform with AI at its core, pricing must evolve as well. Leading companies will be those who align purchase with progress, usage with value, and payment with performance.
SAP‘s announcement to acquire SmartRecruiters is not simply another example of market consolidation. It’s a signal that the future of talent acquisition lies in intelligence, not infrastructure—and that agentic, AI-driven hiring is no longer aspirational. This is not about plugging a product gap in SuccessFactors. It’s a strategic repositioning in response to how enterprise buyers are rethinking the value of the ATS itself.
Not Just a Technology Play
SAP’s acquisition is not about acquiring a missing feature. But this is more about market positioning, buying credibility, and shifting how the enterprise addresses AI in TA. It’s about catching up. Despite years of investment in SuccessFactors, SAP has not led in recruitment innovation. SmartRecruiters offers not only a more modern ATS but also something SAP lacked—a clear path toward agentic capabilities in TA.
And this matters now more than ever. Aptitude Research’s 2025 report found that while 34% of companies are increasing investment in their ATS, a staggering 82% report significant functionality gaps. Simply tracking applicants is no longer enough. Companies expect platforms to recommend, engage, and decide.
Agentic AI Is Not a Trend—It will be the New Standard
SmartRecruiters is already operating in the agentic era. The platform integrates CRM, AI matching, automation, and personalized candidate outreach.
Our latest data shows:
1 in 4 companies are replacing their ATS in 2025.
Only 28% are satisfied with their current ATS decision.
1 in 3 companies are considering adopting Agentic AI in TA.
This acquisition validates the agentic shift. Platforms that act, not just automate, will define the next decade of talent technology.
A Platform Designed to Be Different
SmartRecruiters has always been on a different trajectory. When founder Jérôme Ternynck introduced the platform at ERE’s tech conference in 2008, his pitch wasn’t incremental improvement—it was reinvention. The ATS wasn’t built to be more of the same; it was built to prioritize candidate experience, recruiter collaboration, and business outcomes. It was still an ATS but it felt different from other best of breeds at the time.
That vision has carried through. Under Rebecca Carr’s leadership, SmartRecruiters doubled down on what mattered: marketplace extensibility, high-volume automation, and AI-assisted decision support. She brought discipline and strategy to a bold product vision—and created a platform uniquely positioned for where the market is going, not where it’s been.
It’s No Longer HCM vs. Best-of-Breed
For over a decade, companies evaluated talent acquisition tech through one lens: integrated HCM suites (SAP, Oracle, Workday) vs. best-of-breed solutions (SmartRecruiters, iCIMS, Employ, Greenhouse). But that framework is shifting. The future is not about modularity vs. integration—it’s about intelligence vs. infrastructure.
Today’s leading platforms—like Paradox, Eightfold, and Phenom—weren’t born as ATSs. They emerged from CRM, AI, and candidate experience. They are intelligence-first and/or experience-first, not compliance-first. SmartRecruiters, while founded as an ATS, evolved into this new category—a hiring platform that blends workflow, engagement, and analytics.
As of this year:
54% of enterprises are managing multiple ATSs.
50% are actively evaluating ATS platforms for additional capabilities.
48% report using disparate TA solutions over integrated HCM.
The choice isn’t between integration and functionality anymore. The bar has moved. The question now is: can your platform act intelligently, agentically, and proactively?
More Acquisitions Are Coming
This SAP–SmartRecruiters deal is the tip of the spear. M&A activity in talent tech is accelerating—especially as companies recalibrate around co-pilots, automation, and real-time intelligence. According to Aptitude Research, most ATSs are still failing to deliver in key areas: scheduling, sourcing, engagement, and analytics.
The market is ripe for further consolidation. Platforms that bring agentic capability—not just data tracking—will be acquisition targets. HCM providers will need to either build, buy, or partner to remain competitive.
SAP didn’t just acquire an ATS. It acquired a platform already positioned for the next generation of hiring: intelligence-led, action-oriented, and candidate-first. SmartRecruiters isn’t just a plug-in to SuccessFactors. It’s SAP’s bet on the future of talent technology—and that future is agentic.
I’m excited to see what is next. HRTech will not be boring this fall conference season!
Career sites are undergoing a fundamental transformation — and it’s not happening quietly. Once considered a “check the box” or branding touchpoint, the career site is now a strategic priority with growing urgency and even C-suite visibility. For many organizations, especially those competing for high-volume and high-skill talent, the career site is now seen as a critical extension of the employer brand, candidate experience, and even business performance.
The traditional career site model — static, content-heavy, and largely employer-centric — is no longer serving the needs of today’s job seekers. Candidates expect digital experiences that mirror the convenience and personalization of consumer platforms. In response, a new generation of career sites is taking shape: leaner, more intuitive, conversational, and far strategic front door to the organization. New research from Aptitude found that:
1 in 4 companies are looking to invest in a new career site this year.
62% of those companies stated that they are receiving pressure from their C-level executives to improve the career stie
From job search that surfaces relevant roles instantly, to interfaces that guide rather than overwhelm, this new model reimagines what it means to attract and convert talent.
This shift is not being driven by startups or fast-moving disruptors, but by large enterprise organizations — brands like Marriott that are setting the tone for what modern, high-performing career sites should look and feel like. These companies are moving beyond templates and legacy CMS platforms, investing in custom-built experiences that are conversational, hyper-personalized, and service-led.
But this evolution is also part of something bigger. Career sites are no longer standalone assets — they sit at the intersection of a bigger conversation in TA Tech around candidate experience, engagement, and outcomes. They are where first impressions are made, where talent pipelines are activated, and where company culture becomes real for prospective hires. In this sense, the career site is not just a recruiting tool — it’s a company initiative.
Growing Investment in Career Sites
There has always been an urgency around career sites, but this year even more so. We found that 70% of enterprise companies have a dedicated career site. As labor markets tighten and candidate expectations evolve, organizations are realizing that their ability to compete for talent starts with the experience delivered on their career site. No longer seen as a static entry point or a compliance-driven necessity, the career site is now viewed as a critical part of the TA tech stack.
Our research shows that 1 in 4 enterprise companies plan to replace their career site within the next 12 months, an indicator of just how misaligned current solutions have become with candidate expectations. These replacements reflect more than cosmetic updates — they are efforts to fundamentally rethink search functionality, site speed, design simplicity, and personalization.
This urgency is driven not just by internal dissatisfaction, but by the reality that a poor career site directly impacts candidate drop-off, time-to-hire, and brand perception. For many TA leaders, the career site has become the most visible — and most urgent — fix on their roadmap
Backing this urgency is a marked increase in financial investment. 42% of companies report that they are increasing their investment in their career site over the next year. This is a strong sign that organizations are beginning to treat their career site not as a one-time launch, but as a living digital product — one that must evolve, iterate, and improve over time.
For many organizations, the career site is where change starts — because it’s the most visible, most candidate-facing asset. And once momentum builds, it often leads to broader improvements across the recruiting ecosystem.
Challenges and Realities
As the career site takes on greater strategic importance, the limitations of traditional models have become more visible — and more costly. Despite being the starting point for most job seekers, many career sites still fall short of delivering the kind of efficient, engaging, and intuitive experience that today’s candidates expect. And for many traditional providers, the cost of a career site has gone up. Companies often spend several hundreds on the career site and additional content services to support it.
A closer look at the data and candidate behavior reveals a number of challenges including search, lack of analytics, and low engagement. Additional challenges include site bloat and inability to target audiences like frontline workers.
Top Challenges with Career Sites
Ineffective Search Experience
Search is arguably the most essential feature of any career site — and one of the most underperforming. Candidates arrive with a clear intent: to find a role that matches their skills, goals, and availability. Yet in many cases, the search bar functions poorly, filters are limited, and job results feel generic or irrelevant.
Leading companies have reimagined search as a core design element, placing it at the center of the candidate journey. With intuitive filtering by role type, location, and brand, career sites can enable fast, personalized job discovery — reducing friction and aligning with how people navigate digital platforms in their daily lives.
Slow Time to Engagement
Time-to-engagement — the length of time it takes a visitor to take meaningful action — is a critical performance metric. Yet, 72% of companies report that it takes more than five minutes for candidates to engage with their career site in any meaningful way.
This delay is often due to complex navigation, long content pages, and unclear calls to action. Instead of guiding users toward relevant roles or helpful resources, legacy designs tend to overwhelm or distract.
Modern career sites streamline this process, using dynamic content, personalized landing pages, and job-first logic to engage candidates within the first few clicks.
Content Bloat and Fragmentation
Historically, organizations have taken a “more is better” approach to career site content. But in many cases, this leads to site bloat, where candidates must wade through page after page to find relevant information.
Our research shows that 60% of companies have more than four pages on their career site. While well-intentioned, this excess content can actually undermine engagement — especially when it’s outdated, redundant, or hard to navigate.
Top-performing sites are flipping this model, offering less content, more relevance, and a streamlined flow that focuses on action, not brochure-style storytelling.
Under-Serving Frontline and Hourly Talent
A major blind spot for many employers is the experience of frontline and hourly workers, who represent a significant percentage of the global workforce.
Yet, only 28% of companies with hourly roles have a dedicated career site experience for this segment. This is a missed opportunity. These candidates often apply via mobile, value speed over polish, and expect fast, frictionless experiences — especially for roles in retail, hospitality, and healthcare.
Companies like Marriott are leading the way with tailored job searches, simplified applications, and location-aware content that directly supports this segment.
TruGreen reimagined its career site and saved $1.8 million in 12 weeks.
Limited Analytics and Optimization
Most companies track basic site metrics like visits and page views, but very few have access to behavioral analytics that can improve candidate conversion. Without insights into search abandonment, drop-off rates, or time-on-task, career sites remain static assets instead of adaptive, performance-driven platforms.
In the absence of actionable data, employers struggle to answer key questions:
Why are candidates dropping off? 25%
Which jobs are most viewed but least applied to?
What content actually drives engagement?
Unlocking these insights is essential to evolving the career site into a continuous optimization engine — one that adapts and improves based on real-time candidate behavior.
Key Trends in Career Sites
Less Is More: Dynamic Experiences Over Bloated Content
Modern career sites are shedding their excess. Where many legacy sites still span five to ten static pages, today’s leaders are streamlining the experience, minimizing navigation friction, and delivering dynamic content that adapts to the candidate’s journey.
Marriott exemplifies this “less is more” approach. Rather than overwhelming candidates with corporate content, the site emphasizes fast load times, a simplified interface, and immediate access to job search. It respects the user’s time and keeps the focus on exploration and action, not scrolling.
In an age where attention spans are short and application drop-off is high, simplicity isn’t just a design preference — it’s a competitive advantage.
Built-In Search and Job Discovery
Effective search is no longer optional — it’s a baseline expectation. Candidates expect job sites to work like any top-tier e-commerce experience: predictive, personalized, and fast. Career sites that bury roles beneath layers of content or force users through broken filters are simply being left behind.
Marriott addresses this head-on by embedding intelligent job discovery into the fabric of its site. Candidates can search instantly by location, brand, or role, and see relevant listings in real time — including those targeted to frontline and hourly workers, who are often under-supported on traditional platforms.
When job search is front and center, engagement increases and friction decreases — a pattern echoed in our research.
Conversational and Interactive UX
Static career sites are giving way to experiences that feel guided, responsive, and human. Candidates no longer want to be dropped into a content maze. Instead, they expect a journey that mimics the best of consumer UX — where support, recommendations, and clear calls to action help move them forward.
Marriott delivers on this trend by offering a concierge-like digital experience. The site reflects the brand’s hospitality ethos — creating a tone that is warm, intuitive, and supportive. Interactive elements, clear pathways, and tailored calls-to-action ensure that the experience doesn’t feel transactional, but relational.
This shift from “content to conversation” is setting a new standard in candidate experience.
Consumer-Grade and Global Design
Today’s candidates — regardless of industry or role — bring consumer expectations to the job search. They’re comparing the experience of exploring a career site to their favorite shopping, streaming, or travel platforms. As such, design quality, emotional resonance, and mobile responsiveness are critical.
Marriott’s site is both visually rich and globally consistent. It offers a multilingual experience with localized content and design parity across regions — crucial for an enterprise brand operating in dozens of markets. This attention to detail builds trust and shows respect for the user’s context, whether they’re in Seoul, São Paulo, or Seattle.
Personalization and Inclusive Branding
Career sites must now reflect not only the diversity of roles, but the diversity of the people filling them. That means offering customized pathways for students, veterans, hourly workers, and corporate professionals — and doing so with language that’s inclusive, authentic, and emotionally resonant.
Marriott stands out in its ability to tell real stories from real employees, reflecting a wide range of identities, roles, and career journeys. The site doesn’t just show what jobs are available — it shows who thrives in them. This authenticity is key to building connection, especially among underrepresented candidates seeking belonging.
The White Glove Service Model
As the design of career sites evolves, so does the way they’re built and maintained. Increasingly, enterprise companies are moving away from rigid templates and standard CMS platforms in favor of custom, expert-managed solutions that feel tailored, branded, and effortless to maintain.
This shift is particularly evident in brands like Marriott, where the career site feels crafted — not copied. Pages are clean, focused, and updated without the internal bottlenecks that often plague traditional systems. The experience mirrors the standard of customer service Marriott is known for, reflecting a growing trend: treating candidates like customers.
In this white-glove model, creative assets, job data, UX design, and analytics are managed as part of a continuous service — not a one-off redesign. The result is a site that adapts as the company evolves, without requiring constant internal lift.
The Future State: Rethinking Value
The future of the career site isn’t just about design — it’s about function, flexibility, and strategic value. Career sites are no longer portals to browse jobs; they are platforms for interaction, insight, and trust-building.
Tomorrow’s career site will be:
Fast: Designed for instant job discovery and mobile access
Personalized: Tailored by role, location, and user behavior
Emotional: Rooted in storytelling and brand connection
Smart: Driven by analytics, responsive to candidate behavior
Service-led: Continuously optimized by experts, not locked into static templates
In this model, the career site becomes a living extension of the organization’s talent strategy — and for candidates, a seamless, branded, and empowering first step in their journey.
